07222017Headline:

Denver, Colorado

HomeColoradoDenver

Email Linda Chalat Linda Chalat on LinkedIn Linda Chalat on Avvo
Linda Chalat
Linda Chalat
Attorney • (866) 735-1102 Ext 366

Years of “Tort Reform” and Hospitals No Safer

2 comments

For the past two decades, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce has sponsored tort reform measures limiting medical malpractice claims. The U.S. Chamber supports health courts, caps on punitive damages, and other medical liability reforms that restrict access to the courts for injured patients – and it has been successful in many states in promoting these changes. Yet, in the first large study of hospital safety in a decade, results show that patient safety is not improving.

The study, conducted from 2002 to 2007 in 10 North Carolina hospitals, found that harm to patients was common and that the number of incidents did not decrease over time. The most common problems were complications from procedures or drugs and hospital-acquired infections. The study is being published on Thursday in The New England Journal of Medicine.

The study is viewed as the most rigorous to collect data about patient safety since a landmark report in 1999 found that medical mistakes caused as many as 98,000 deaths and more than one million injuries a year in the United States. That report, by the Institute of Medicine, an independent group that advises the government on health matters, led to a national movement to reduce errors and make hospital stays less hazardous to patients’ health.

This was just about the time the U.S. Chamber began aggressively attacking plaintiffs’ lawyers handling medical malpractice lawsuits. But if compromised safety for patients continues to result in deaths and permanent injuries, should not those patients receive an opportunity for a fair award for injuries suffered?

Among the preventable problems identified in this new study were severe bleeding during an operation, serious breathing trouble caused by a procedure that was performed incorrectly, a fall that dislocated a patient’s hip and damaged a nerve, and vaginal cuts caused by a vacuum device used to help deliver a baby.

North Carolina was chosen for the study because its hospitals, compared with those in most states, have been more involved in programs to improve patient safety. But instead of improvements, the researchers found a high rate of problems. About 18 percent of patients were harmed by medical care, some more than once, and 63.1 percent of the injuries were judged to be preventable. Most of the problems were temporary and treatable, but some were serious, and a few — 2.4 percent — caused or contributed to a patient’s death, the study found.

Many of the problems were caused by the failure to use measures that had been proved to avert mistakes and to prevent infections from devices like urinary catheters, ventilators and lines inserted into veins and arteries.

A recent government report found similar results, determining that 13.5 percent of Medicare beneficiaries — 134,000 patients — experienced “adverse events” during hospital stays. According to this October 2008 report, the extra treatment required as a result of the injuries could cost Medicare several billion dollars a year. And in 1.5 percent of the patients — 15,000 in the month studied — medical mistakes contributed to their deaths. That report, issued this month by the inspector general of the Department of Health and Human Services, was based on a sample of Medicare records from patients discharged from hospitals.

The researchers found 588 instances in which a patient was harmed by medical care, or 25.1 injuries per 100 admissions. Not all the problems were serious. Most were temporary and treatable, like a bout with severe low blood sugar from receiving too much insulin or a urinary infection caused by a catheter. But 42.7 percent of them required extra time in the hospital for treatment of problems like an infected surgical incision.

But in 2.9 percent of the cases, patients suffered a permanent injury — brain damage from a stroke that could have been prevented after an operation, for example. A little more than 8 percent of the problems were life-threatening, like severe bleeding during surgery. And 2.4 percent of them caused or contributed to a patient’s death — like bleeding and organ failure after surgery.

2 Comments

Have an opinion about this post? Please consider leaving a comment or subscribing to the feed to have future articles delivered to your feed reader.

  1. james O'Hare RPLU AIC AIS says:
    up arrow

    Good Morning:

    There is no way that tort reform was meant to make hospital care safer. More nurses with a manageable patient load cuts down on errors. Fatigue and communication cause most incidents. Not tort reform.

    How is access to courts restricted? Caps on punitive damages are reasonable. They are geared to punish, not compensate for a measurable element of damages. Pain is subjective and unmeasurable. All other causes of action can be measured.

    You report that there are 98k deaths due to med mal each year. Who is in charge of counting, and why isnt he referring these cases to the plaintiff bar? I have seen this quote before, but examine the concept. Yep – he died from med mal, add one to the count Boris ! – irresponsible guesswork. Is there a data base that pathologists report med mal deaths ?

    Tort reform is the old freedom fighter / terrorist argument. If it favors the plaintiff bar it is just, if not, an abomination to justice.

    This has never been about justice, it is about money $- period. There is a lot of cash involved, with the injured getting maybe 35% of the total cost of any litigation. Attorneys from both bars, reporters and experts butter their bread with the 65% that doesnt go to the patient. 65% of each dollar goes to the process than to repair the injured. This is the tort reform needed. More money to the plaintiff- good? Less cost for the carrier – Good? Effect on the frequency of med mal = none

    regards Jim
    VP med mal claims Physicians Ins Co Fl

  2. Doc99 says:
    up arrow

    Years of the current Medical Malpractice system, claiming to insure safer healthcare, and hospitals are no safer. I’d say the Med Mal System is an Epic Fail.